First we read that Stuart Hall was innocent. Then we read he was guilty, but only of touching a nine year old through her clothes. Rape charges were dropped and the media has reported a nicely packaged and sanitised version of events.
Then this article appeared in the Independent:
In the article it states:
“To have a man of my father’s age take a benevolent interest in me seemed wonderful to a girl of my history,” she writes. She went to the studios encouraged by her mum and head teacher. And went back again, and once more. He seemed caring. Then, having groomed her, she alleges, he got her drunk and started the abuse. She kept going back. His mates, she claims, helped Hall with his filthy hobby. he sex acts hurt. Sometimes she bled.”
Shocking stuff. So Stuart Hall isn’t just an old groper. He raped a child until she bled, with his “mates”.
Stuart Hall is a paedophile and was part of a paedophile ring. That is what the article is telling you.
A BBC paedo ring? Like the one they said did not exist? Savile acted alone, blah blah fucking blah.
The bigger problem is that this is NOT the original article text.
The original article text stated:
“Then, having groomed her, she alleges, he got her drunk and started the abuse. She kept going back. His mates, including an MP who is now a Peer, she claims, helped Hall with his filthy hobby.”
An MP who is now a Peer.
The powers that be have moved fast. If you search, you see legal notices for removal of search results related to this text on both Google and Bing. Someone does not want you to see the original text. Chilling effects happening quick-sharp nowadays. They have learned since McAlpine.
What you are witnessing ladies and gentlemen is the latest cover-up by the BBC and the Government. Stuart Hall abused children AT THE BBC with an MP who is now a PEER. If you were in any doubt about cover-ups or that the conspiracy theorists are wrong about the Paedo scandals in the country being covered-up, well here is your evidence. Happening before your very eyes, in real time.